Name: How to Respond Better to the Next Pandemic: Remedying Institutional Failures (en Inglés)
Price: 227701.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: Buchanan, Allen ; Fabre, Cécile ; Tucker, Paul
ISBN: 9781647691967

portada How to Respond Better to the Next Pandemic: Remedying Institutional Failures (en Inglés)

How to Respond Better to the Next Pandemic: Remedying Institutional Failures (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Allen Buchanan

Contribuciones de

Paul Tucker

Cécile Fabre

Editorial

University of Utah Press

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

144

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9781647691967

Categorías

Salud pública y medicina preventiva
Sistemas y servicios de salud

How to Respond Better to the Next Pandemic: Remedying Institutional Failures (en Inglés)

Allen Buchanan (Autor) · Paul Tucker (Contribuciones de) · Cécile Fabre (Contribuciones de) · University of Utah Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 18 a 23 días háb.

$ 455.403$ 227.701

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 2 unidades

$ 227.701

¡Envío Gratis! Llega entre el 13 Ago y el 24 Ago a Bogota, Cundinamarca. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "How to Respond Better to the Next Pandemic: Remedying Institutional Failures (en Inglés)"

There is no shortage of criticisms of U.S. COVID-19 policy. This book argues that officials at the highest levels lied to the public or deliberately suppressed relevant information, shamelessly over-sold the efficacy of masks and vaccines, and enacted lock-down policies of unproven value that caused massive economic, educational, and psycho-social damage. In How to Respond Better to the Next Pandemic Allen Buchanan argues that, contrary to widespread opinion, the primary cause of flawed COVID-19 policy was not defective leadership, but rather institutional failure. Decisions were made through processes that lacked the most basic safeguards against the large-institution "yes-man" and group-think phenomena and included virtually no provisions for holding decision makers accountable. More fundamentally, policy makers did not fulfill the crucial duty to provide plausible public justifications for their decisions. They disguised the fact that scientific opinion was divided on the appropriateness of the policies they endorsed and labeled those who disagreed with them as anti-scientific. In some cases, they responded to criticism, not by engaging it on the issues, but by branding their critics as quacks.