Name: Judicial Avoidance: Balancing Competences in Constitutional Adjudication (Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory) (en Inglés)
Price: 539299.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: Das Chagas Carolina Alves; Barzun Charles (Edt); De Visser Maartje (Edt); Klatt Matthias (Edt)
ISBN: 9781509961498

portada Judicial Avoidance: Balancing Competences in Constitutional Adjudication (Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Hart Publishing

Autor

Das Chagas Carolina Alves; Barzun Charles (Edt); De Visser Maartje (Edt); Klatt Matthias (Edt)

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

176

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9781509961498

Judicial Avoidance: Balancing Competences in Constitutional Adjudication (Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory) (en Inglés)

Das Chagas Carolina Alves; Barzun Charles (Edt); De Visser Maartje (Edt); Klatt Matthias (Edt) (Autor) · Hart Publishing · Tapa Dura

Libro Físico

$ 539.299

$ 829.690

Ahorras: $ 290.392

35% descuento

Cantidad
Estado: Nuevo
Quedan 2 unidades

Envío normal

Origen: Reino Unido (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 24 de Mayo y el Jueves 30 de Mayo.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Colombia entre 1 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Judicial Avoidance: Balancing Competences in Constitutional Adjudication (Hart Studies in Constitutional Theory) (en Inglés)"

This book analyses cases of judicial avoidance: what happens when courts leave some or all of the merits of a case undecided? It explores examples of justiciability assessments and deferential approaches regarding the decision of another authority and examines legitimacy issues involving judicial avoidance. The reader is presented with answers to two fundamental questions that guide the development of the book: - Is it legitimate to practise judicial avoidance?- How could judicial avoidance be practised legitimately? The conflict of competences, which often emerges in instances of judicial avoidance, is an important book baseline. From this conflict, the book considers and defends the possibility of applying 'formal balancing' to provide a clearer structure of the exercise of justiciability and judicial deference. The 'formal balancing' methodology is based on Alexy's principles theory, and its connection with judicial avoidance represents a significant contribution and novel point in constitutional adjudication