Name: A. V. Dicey and the Common law Constitutional Tradition: A Legal Turn of Mind (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law) (en Inglés)
SKU: 54257587
Price: 165520.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: Walters, Mark D.
ISBN: 9781009241533

portada A. V. Dicey and the Common law Constitutional Tradition: A Legal Turn of Mind (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law) (en Inglés)

A. V. Dicey and the Common law Constitutional Tradition: A Legal Turn of Mind (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Mark D. Walters

Editorial

Cambridge University Press

Año

2022

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

480

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9x15.2x2.5 cm

Peso

0.64 kg.

ISBN13

9781009241533

Categorías

Constitución

A. V. Dicey and the Common law Constitutional Tradition: A Legal Turn of Mind (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law) (en Inglés)

Mark D. Walters (Autor) · Cambridge University Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 12 a 16 días háb.

$ 331.041$ 165.520

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

$ 165.520

¡Envío Gratis! Llega entre el 30 Oct y el 09 Nov a Bogota, Cundinamarca. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "A. V. Dicey and the Common law Constitutional Tradition: A Legal Turn of Mind (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law) (en Inglés)"

In the common law world, Albert Venn Dicey (1835-1922) is known as the high priest of orthodox constitutional theory, as an ideological and nationalistic positivist. In his analytical coldness, his celebration of sovereign power, and his incessant drive to organize and codify legal rules separate from moral values or political realities, Dicey is an uncanny figure. This book challenges this received view of Dicey. Through a re-examination of his life and his 1885 book Law of the Constitution, the high priest Dicey is defrocked and a more human Dicey steps forward to offer alternative ways of reading his canonical text, who struggled to appreciate law as a form of reasoned discourse that integrates values of legality and authority through methods of ordinary legal interpretation. The result is a unique common law constitutional discourse through which assertions of sovereign power are conditioned by moral aspirations associated with the rule of law.