Name: Contesting 'Good' Governance: Crosscultural Perspectives on Representation, Accountability and Public Space (en Inglés)
SKU: 56033467
Price: 273029.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: Poluha, Eva ; Rosendahl, Mona
ISBN: 9781138879201

portada Contesting 'Good' Governance: Crosscultural Perspectives on Representation, Accountability and Public Space (en Inglés)

Contesting 'Good' Governance: Crosscultural Perspectives on Representation, Accountability and Public Space (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Routledge

Autor

Poluha, Eva ; Rosendahl, Mona

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

284

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781138879201

N° edición

Categorías

Obras de consulta
Antropología social y cultural, etnografía
Derechos civiles y ciudadanía

Contesting 'Good' Governance: Crosscultural Perspectives on Representation, Accountability and Public Space (en Inglés)

Poluha, Eva ; Rosendahl, Mona (Autor) · Routledge · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 16 a 22 días háb.

$ 546.058$ 273.029

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 10 unidades

$ 273.029

¡Envío Gratis! Llega entre el 02 Dic y el 14 Dic a Bogota, Cundinamarca. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Contesting 'Good' Governance: Crosscultural Perspectives on Representation, Accountability and Public Space (en Inglés)"

Research in localities in India, Cuba, Ethiopia, Taiwan and Lebanon is used to develop a broader understanding of global political phenomena such as democracy, representation and accountability. To contextualise aspects of 'good' governance the articles in the volume deal with people's perceptions of and interactions with the state; how they interpret government laws and regulations; how they interact with officials and how they comment on acts and speeches made by local bureaucrats and national power holders. Through a discussion of the much debated distinction between private and public, the articles show how the notions of public and private are interconnected in many ways, how they are contested and reformulated by people based on their experiences, and how they can be used as a tool in questioning dominant ideas and ways of executing 'good' governance.