Name: Debating James White: Shocking Failures of the "Undefeatable" Anti-Catholic Champion (en Inglés)
Price: 101118.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: Armstrong, Dave
ISBN: 9781304586711

portada Debating James White: Shocking Failures of the "Undefeatable" Anti-Catholic Champion (en Inglés)

Debating James White: Shocking Failures of the "Undefeatable" Anti-Catholic Champion (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Dave Armstrong

Editorial

Lulu.com

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

396

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 2.2 cm

Peso

0.58 kg.

ISBN13

9781304586711

Categorías

Cristianismo

Debating James White: Shocking Failures of the "Undefeatable" Anti-Catholic Champion (en Inglés)

Dave Armstrong (Autor) · Lulu.com · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 18 a 24 días háb.

$ 202.236$ 101.118

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

$ 101.118

¡Envío Gratis! Llega entre el 12 Ago y el 24 Ago a Bogota, Cundinamarca. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Debating James White: Shocking Failures of the "Undefeatable" Anti-Catholic Champion (en Inglés)"

The anti-Catholic is one who thinks that Catholicism is not a Christian system of theology and that to be a good Christian and get saved, one must be a bad Catholic; that is, reject several tenets of Catholicism. James White (Reformed Baptist) is the leading and most influential anti-Catholic today. He specializes in debates, preferring moderated oral debates. I prefer written debate. This book features twelve back-and-forth debates with James White and also critiques or refutations of his writings. For those who agree with me that written, back-and-forth, substantive exchanges are worthy of the name "debate," this book will be a (hopefully helpful) close examination of the flawed theology of James White and his critiques of Catholicism. I'm happy, as always, to present both sides and let the reader judge. This is the beauty of dialogue. Readers may take in the arguments and data of both proponents in a dispute and exercise critical faculties in order to decide where the truth is to be found.