Name: Progress in Planning, Volume 50, Part 2: Meaningful Collective Choice? Public Planning and Arrow's Theorem (en Inglés)
Price: 293263.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: Sager, T.
ISBN: 9780080434438

portada Progress in Planning, Volume 50, Part 2: Meaningful Collective Choice? Public Planning and Arrow's Theorem (en Inglés)

Progress in Planning, Volume 50, Part 2: Meaningful Collective Choice? Public Planning and Arrow's Theorem (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

T. Sager

Editorial

Elsevier

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9780080434438

Categorías

Administración pública
Ciencia: cuestiones generales
Planificación y gestión urbana y municipal

Progress in Planning, Volume 50, Part 2: Meaningful Collective Choice? Public Planning and Arrow's Theorem (en Inglés)

T. Sager (Autor) · Elsevier · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 17 a 21 días háb.

$ 533.205$ 293.263

-45%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 100 unidades

$ 293.263

¡Envío Gratis! Llega entre el 13 Jul y el 21 Jul a Bogota, Cundinamarca. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Progress in Planning, Volume 50, Part 2: Meaningful Collective Choice? Public Planning and Arrow's Theorem (en Inglés)"

This essay is based on Kenneth Arrow's celebrated impossibility theorem stating that under a few quite reasonable assumptions, collective choice cannot be simultaneously logical and fair. The purpose here is to argue that planning procedures can reduce the likelihood that decision cycles will arise when democracy is pursued. It is examined whether some of Arrow's assumptions can be relaxed under widespread and participatory planning, since planning and public debate may force a minimum of conformity on the stated individual preferences. However, collective choices have to be made in spite of the impossibility theorem. Well-known theories of planning, especially synoptic planning and disjointed incrementalism, are analyzed to assess if they are acceptable ways of organizing decision-making processes in the face of Arrow's impossibilities.