Name: Some Landmarks of Twentieth Century Contract law (Clarendon law Lectures) (en Inglés)
Price: 522953.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: Guenter Treitel
ISBN: 9780199255757

portada Some Landmarks of Twentieth Century Contract law (Clarendon law Lectures) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Oxford University Press

Autor

Guenter Treitel

Año

2002

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

168

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN

019925575x

ISBN13

9780199255757

N° edición

Categorías

Derecho administrativo y administraciones públicas

Some Landmarks of Twentieth Century Contract law (Clarendon law Lectures) (en Inglés)

Guenter Treitel (Autor) · Oxford University Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 522.953

$ 871.588

Ahorras: $ 348.635

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 07 de Junio y el Viernes 21 de Junio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Colombia entre 1 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Some Landmarks of Twentieth Century Contract law (Clarendon law Lectures) (en Inglés)"

This book contains a slightly expanded version of the Clarendon Lectures in Law given in Oxford in 2001. It deals with major contributions made by the English Courts in the Twentieth Century to three important areas of English contract law. The first is the variation of contracts by subsequent agreement, where developments in the doctrines of consideration and estoppel are discussed in the light of Williams v Roffey Bros and Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd and the High Trees case. The second is the battle over privity of contract, discussed mainly in the light of the Midlands Silicone case and Beswick v Beswick; much of this discussion retains its practical importance even after the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. The third is the development of different types of contractual terms: starting with the distinction between 'conditions' and 'warranties', this discussion traces the development of 'intermediate' or 'innominate' terms in the light of the Hong Kong Fir case and later authorities; it also considers the development and continuing significance of the concept of the 'fundamental' term.