Name: The Metaphysics and Logos of Psuché and Psychoanalysis: An Aristotelian and Kantian Critique (en Inglés)
SKU: 63939758
Price: 286118.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: Michael R D James
ISBN: 9786204740607

portada The Metaphysics and Logos of Psuché and Psychoanalysis: An Aristotelian and Kantian Critique (en Inglés)

The Metaphysics and Logos of Psuché and Psychoanalysis: An Aristotelian and Kantian Critique (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Lap Lambert Academic Publishing

Autor

Michael R D James

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

244

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9786204740607

The Metaphysics and Logos of Psuché and Psychoanalysis: An Aristotelian and Kantian Critique (en Inglés)

Michael R D James (Autor) · Lap Lambert Academic Publishing · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 20 a 24 días háb.

$ 572.236$ 286.118

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 10 unidades

$ 286.118

¡Envío Gratis! Llega entre el 15 Oct y el 22 Oct a Bogota, Cundinamarca. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "The Metaphysics and Logos of Psuché and Psychoanalysis: An Aristotelian and Kantian Critique (en Inglés)"

The Ancient Greek Category of Psuché has been mistranslated and thereby has been repressed as a categorical idea in Medieval and Contemporary Philosophy. The closest correct translation of Psuché would be "life-form" and Aristotle was the Philosopher par excellence who provided us with a hylomorphic theory of life-forms, which are to be contrasted with inorganic forms of existence that belong essentially to the mineral world. Kant, in his later work postulated both a metaphysics of Nature and a Metaphysics of Morals, which implied differing categorical frameworks for these different kinds of study (logos), that in turn resists reduction to just one method or theory, unless, it is argued, the theory is of a hylomorphic kind. Areté, arché, dike, phronesis, and eudaimonia, have also been problematically translated in a way that seems to demand either materialistic or dualistic methods and theories, both of which have been rejected by hylomorphic argumentation. Freud stated that his Psychology was Kantian and to the extent that Kantian theory assumes much of hylomorphic theory, this implies that Freud too must be committed to some of the assumptions of hylomorphic theory.