Name: The Politics of Spectacle and Emotion in the 2016 Presidential Campaign (Palgrave Studies in us Elections) (en Inglés)
Price: 280916.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: Heather E. Yates
ISBN: 9783030158033

portada The Politics of Spectacle and Emotion in the 2016 Presidential Campaign (Palgrave Studies in us Elections) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Palgrave Pivot

Autor

Heather E. Yates

Año

2019

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

119

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9783030158033

N° edición

Categorías

La democracia

The Politics of Spectacle and Emotion in the 2016 Presidential Campaign (Palgrave Studies in us Elections) (en Inglés)

Heather E. Yates (Autor) · Palgrave Pivot · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 280.916

$ 468.193

Ahorras: $ 187.277

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 24 de Junio y el Lunes 08 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Colombia entre 1 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "The Politics of Spectacle and Emotion in the 2016 Presidential Campaign (Palgrave Studies in us Elections) (en Inglés)"

This book examines the highly emotional context of the 2016 US presidential campaign through the scope of political theater and emotional attribution. It takes inventory of the political landscape that defined the campaign and advances the argument that the campaign’s high intensity generated a more interest-attentive citizenry and became an exercise in political theater. A framework operationalizing the components of political spectacle anchors the analysis treating emotions, affect transfer and the rise of negative partisanship. The analytical scope is focused specifically on voters’ emotional responses toward Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton and empirically demonstrates the effects of discrete feelings on five emotional dimensions including pride, hope, fear, anger, and disgust on attitudes about issues ranging from the economy to immigration to the 2016 Supreme Court vacancy. Anchored in the Affective Intelligence Theory and affect transfer, the findings lend support to the principles of negative partisanship that characterized the 2016 presidential contest.