Reseña del libro "The Scholar in Chains (en Inglés)"
In the summer of 1326, guards emptied a cell in the Damascus citadel of everything a scholar needed to remain a scholar. His books. His paper. His ink. His pen. The authorities understood exactly what they were doing. A scholar in prison was still, in some sense, a scholar. A scholar without a pen was something closer to buried alive.It did not work. His students kept coming. They could not smuggle him paper past the guards, so they memorized instead, carrying his words out of that cell in nothing but their own recollection. When he died two years later, the government that had spent decades trying to silence him watched an estimated two hundred thousand men and fifteen thousand women fill the streets of Damascus for his funeral — the largest the city had seen for any scholar in living memory.This is the story of Ibn Taymiyyah: the boy who fled the Mongol advance out of Harran, memorized the entire Quran by age seven, and grew into one of the most consequential and most contested minds Islam has ever produced. He personally negotiated with a Mongol army to free captive Muslims and Christians alike. He issued a wartime fatwa that helped break a Mongol invasion at the Battle of Shaqhab. He challenged the theological establishment of his era on the nature of God, the visitation of graves, and the law of divorce — and paid for every one of those challenges with formal hearings, public condemnation, and repeated imprisonment.He never once backed down. Not in Damascus. Not in Cairo. Not with his pen taken from his hand.Seven centuries later, his reform still divides the very tradition he set out to restore — claimed by scholars across the Muslim world, foundational to reform movements that reshaped it, and, in a genuinely troubling minority of cases, invoked by modern extremists in ways his own broader writing would never have condoned. The Scholar in Chains tells his story honestly: the conviction that never wavered, the cost it demanded, and the funeral that revealed, in the end, exactly who had actually won the argument. Read more
