Name: The State Theory of Money (en Inglés)
SKU: 56290109
Price: 79163.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: Knapp, Georg Friedrich ; Lucas, H. M. ; Bonar, James
ISBN: 9781614274964

portada The State Theory of Money (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Georg Friedrich Knapp

Adaptado por

James Bonar

Traducido por

H. M. Lucas

Editorial

Martino Fine Books

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

326

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9x15.2x1.9 cm

Peso

0.48 kg.

ISBN13

9781614274964

Categorías

Políticas del gobierno central
Economía monetaria
Economía política
Hacienda pública, fiscalidad

The State Theory of Money (en Inglés)

Georg Friedrich Knapp (Autor) · James Bonar (Adaptado por) · H. M. Lucas (Traducido por) · Martino Fine Books · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 18 a 24 días háb.

$ 158.325$ 79.163

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

$ 79.163

Llega entre el 01 Dic y el 11 Dic a Bogota, Cundinamarca. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "The State Theory of Money (en Inglés)"

2013 Reprint of 1924 Edition. Full facsimile of the original edition, not reproduced with Optical Recognition Software. Georg Friedrich Knapp (1842-1926) was a German economist who in 1895 published "The State Theory of Money," which founded the chartalist school of monetary theory, which takes the statist stance that money must have no intrinsic value and strictly be used as governmentally-issued token, i.e., fiat money. Published originally in 1905, it created a stir among academics and policy makers, with proponents and critics both arguing forcefully about it. It was written at a time when monetary matters were in a great flux. Throughout the world, countries debated the optimal metallic standard for their monetary systems. Should it be silver, gold, both in a fixed relation (bimetallism), a combination of the two (symmetalism), or should the selection of the standard be left to the market? Knapp put the debate on new ground by suggesting that there need not be a metallic standard at all. Ideas about the desirability of paper money not backed by gold or other metals had been presented before but were never able to command academic respectability.