Name: Towards a maximalist framework for defining language proficiency (en Inglés)
Price: 186370.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: Kamai, Richard Awoshiri
ISBN: 9783659630811

portada Towards a maximalist framework for defining language proficiency (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Richard Awoshiri Kamai

Editorial

LAP Lambert Academic Publishing

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 0.4 cm

Peso

0.11 kg.

ISBN13

9783659630811

Categorías

Consejos sobre carreras profesionales y exitosas

Towards a maximalist framework for defining language proficiency (en Inglés)

Richard Awoshiri Kamai (Autor) · LAP Lambert Academic Publishing · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 186.370

$ 310.616

Ahorras: $ 124.247

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 24 de Junio y el Lunes 08 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Colombia entre 1 y 5 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Towards a maximalist framework for defining language proficiency (en Inglés)"

This monograph examined the relationship between language proficiency (LP) and language and text analytical skills (LTAS) as frameworks for addressing comprehension difficulties resulting from terminology variation in life sciences textbooks. Fifteen (15) senior secondary science students, with varying degrees of language competences, were assigned to five (5) groups. A language proficiency test and a test that requires students to process variant life sciences terminology were administered to the two categories of students. A Chi-square test was used to determine whether there will be a significant difference in the performance of students on both tests. The result revealed a computed value of (X2 =18>3.84146) indicating a significant difference in the performance of the students on the language proficiency test and the language and text analytical skills test. Based on this finding, the study concluded that language proficiency-as narrowly defined by language educationists-is not always a factor of achievement in science. The study recommended that some linguistic explanations other than language proficiency are required in language-oriented discussions on achievement in science.