Name: Vigilance and Restraint in the Common law of Judicial Review (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law) (en Inglés)
SKU: 52214886
Price: 185031.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: Dean R. Knight
ISBN: 9781316640340

portada Vigilance and Restraint in the Common law of Judicial Review (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law) (en Inglés)

Vigilance and Restraint in the Common law of Judicial Review (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law) (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Cambridge University Press

Autor

Dean R. Knight

Año

2019

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

307

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

ISBN13

9781316640340

Categorías

Constitución

Vigilance and Restraint in the Common law of Judicial Review (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law) (en Inglés)

Dean R. Knight (Autor) · Cambridge University Press · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 18 a 24 días háb.

$ 370.062$ 185.031

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan más de 100 unidades

$ 185.031

¡Envío Gratis! Llega entre el 11 Sep y el 22 Sep a Bogota, Cundinamarca. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "Vigilance and Restraint in the Common law of Judicial Review (Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law) (en Inglés)"

The mediation of the balance between vigilance and restraint is a fundamental feature of judicial review of administrative action in the Anglo-Commonwealth. This balance is realised through the modulation of the depth of scrutiny when reviewing the decisions of ministers, public bodies and officials. While variability is ubiquitous, it takes different shapes and forms. Dean R. Knight explores the main shapes and forms employed in judicial review in England, Canada, Australia and New Zealand over the last fifty years. Four schemata are drawn from the case law and taken back to conceptual foundations, exposing their commonality and differences, and each approach is evaluated. This detailed methodology provides a sound basis for decisions and debates about how variability should be brought to individual cases and will be of great value to legal scholars, judges and practitioners interested in judicial review.