Name: New Chicago-Area Airport: Site Comparison, Selection Process, and Federal Funding: Rced-93-105 (en Inglés)
SKU: 59673989
Price: 57196.00 COP
Availability: InStock
Author: U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (
ISBN: 9781287170976

portada New Chicago-Area Airport: Site Comparison, Selection Process, and Federal Funding: Rced-93-105 (en Inglés)

New Chicago-Area Airport: Site Comparison, Selection Process, and Federal Funding: Rced-93-105 (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Bibliogov

Autor

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office (

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

24.6x18.9x0.2 cm

Peso

0.10 kg.

ISBN13

9781287170976

Categorías

Política y gobierno

New Chicago-Area Airport: Site Comparison, Selection Process, and Federal Funding: Rced-93-105 (en Inglés)

U. S. Government Accountability Office ( ; U. S. Government Accountability Office ( (Autor) · Bibliogov · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo Importado

Envío: 19 a 25 días háb.

$ 114.391$ 57.196

-50%

Costos de importación incluídos en el precio ✅

Libro Nuevo

Quedan 100 unidades

$ 57.196

Llega entre el 16 Oct y el 27 Oct a Bogota, Cundinamarca. Seleccionar ubicación

Agregar a lista de deseos

Reseña del libro "New Chicago-Area Airport: Site Comparison, Selection Process, and Federal Funding: Rced-93-105 (en Inglés)"

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on issues regarding site selection for a new Chicago-area airport, focusing on: (1) how the five candidate sites compared; (2) how a policy committee used a study in selecting a site for the new airport; and (3) how each of the five sites would affect the federal Airport Improvement Program (AIP). GAO found that: (1) the study did not indicate a clear-cut choice for the location of a new Chicago-area airport; (2) rural sites would cause the least airspace congestion and the fewest air traffic delays, and would cost less than the urban sites; (3) the study did not include cost data for comparing collateral development costs; (4) the urban sites would result in the cleanup of most hazardous waste, but would substantially increase costs; (5) the policy committee used the study as one of several data sources for site selection; (6) the site selection process was strongly influenced by the predominance of policy committee members from Illinois; (7) the study assumed that the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) would fund 20 percent of the eligible cost regardless of which site was selected; and (8) AIP funding for any of the sites, especially the more expensive urban sites, would affect AIP funding for other projects.